Friday, March 26, 2010

Visceral affinity, emotional affinty-covalent and ionic

What's visceral may NOT translate into an emotional bond. If there is a high degree of 'vibe-resonance' then you can get by the verbal paradigm minefields and proceed and build on an intuitive trust and reciprocating reliance of each other. Much like your relationship with a friendly animal (aren't we all?!), once the goodwill of intent is established and built on, the stronger the bond than the contingency based on dogma (no pun about my 4-legged critters).

What is infatuation and lust is different from mutual attraction. In the former, it can be solely from one perspective. Like an ionic bond in chemistry where an atom gives up its electron to the positive ion of another atom. The person in infatuation or lust has given their emotional energy to the idea of a second person, without a reciprocation from that second person.

On the other hand, a mutual attraction is a sharing like a covalent bond, such as water-h2o. Both elements give the needed reactions for a stable relationship. Two person who jointly recognize and reciprocate along similar or equal energies of intent provide that kind of relationship.

The possibilities from either relations provide options that are not restricted or fabricated, but natural. The resonating frequencies of the bond are the determinative factors and the affective glue that provide the atmospherics that give the relationship its potential beyond the base relation. Viscerally, this is the catalyst for the sentiments that run hot and ardorous that provide the cultural and social recognition between the actors and those who observe the phenomena between the two.

Morals, traditions, and decorum are just tangent forces to this cosmic reaction fusing a new metaphysics of perspective in the milieu of human experience. What nature has set in motion is beyond the vain moralities of social or cultural consensus. It is this reality that defies the logic and rational which the mandarins of whatever paternalisms or maternalisms would want to impose as artificial prohibitions on this eternal, ubiquitous cosmic force.

It is the foreplay intercourse of visceral physics and chemistry.

No comments:

Post a Comment